Read history

27 February 1559: a bill, not an act

On 27 February 1559 a government-backed bill restoring royal supremacy over the English church reached the House of Lords, having passed the Commons.

It was an early and severe proposal. It would have styled Elizabeth Supreme Head, and required an oath under threat of a traitor's death.

No Act of Supremacy and no Act of Uniformity became law that day.

A dozen bishops against thirty lords

The bishops opposed the measure in the Lords. The Marian bishops formed the core of the resistance to a proposal that threatened open adherents of Roman jurisdiction with the penalties of treason.

About twelve prelates were in a position to obstruct the Crown's programme, because scarcely more than about thirty temporal lords ordinarily attended.

What actually became law

Opposition in the Lords forced the supremacy proposal into a substantially milder form by March, and the final settlement required new bills after Easter.

The Acts of Supremacy and Uniformity that passed were different bills, given royal assent on 8 May. The familiar title Supreme Governor belonged to that later compromise, not to the bill before the Lords in February.

1559: a prince from Lamjung takes Gorkha

In 1559 Dravya Shah, a prince from neighbouring Lamjung, violently removed Gorkha's existing chieftain and took control of the principality.

A Nepal government history gives the traditional date as 25 Bhadra 1616 Bikram Sambat, and says Dravya's forces surrounded the Gorkha palace, killed the Khadka ruler and installed Dravya as king.

The same account says an earlier assault had run fifteen days and failed.

The insiders who made it possible

Government and chronicle-based accounts credit local allies with supporting the seizure: Bhagirath Pant, Ganesh Pandey, Sarveshwar Khanal, Gangaram Rana and Keshav Bohora.

Narayan Das Arjyal is traditionally said to have installed or crowned Dravya after the conquest. A published chronology gives his reign as 1559–1570.

Who exactly was displaced is unclear. Sources variously identify the chieftain as Khadka, Khadka Magar, Khasa or a member of another Tibeto-Burman group, and John Whelpton describes his identity as uncertain.

What the date cannot carry

The exact Gregorian date of 4 September is not securely supported. Strong sources establish 1559, Nepalese accounts give 25 Bhadra 1616 BS, and published conversions and weekday traditions conflict.

The conquest narratives come largely from later royal genealogies, and the Gorkha Durbar Care Office describes many of their details as exaggerated and story-like.

What was founded was the Shah state of Gorkha, not the modern country of Nepal. Expansion into the Kathmandu Valley came generations later.

Nothing happened

No identifiable contemporary event, and no particular day in 1559, marked the completion of a "first generation" of the Protestant Reformation.

The claim is a later scheme of historical periodization rather than something witnessed at the time. Churches, political conflicts and reform movements all continued past the year.

Where the year comes from

The date appears as the endpoint of two modern surveys: Elton's edited volume The Reformation, 1520–1559, and Spitz's The Protestant Reformation, 1517–1559. Those titles appear to be the basis of the claim.

A book's terminal date is evidence of editorial periodization, not proof that the process itself ended there.

Cambridge's own description of Elton's volume says it follows open conflict through the "uneasy peace" of the 1560s — so even this endpoint is a survey boundary.

Other lines historians draw

"First generation" is not defined in the cited claim, and neither book title establishes that historians generally agree on such a generation ending in 1559.

Other periodizations use the Peace of Augsburg in 1555, the close of the Council of Trent in 1563, or the beginning or end of the Thirty Years' War.

The English, French, Scottish, German, Swiss and radical reformations followed different chronologies, and cannot securely be collapsed into one finishing date.

Eiroku 3, fifth month, nineteenth day

On the nineteenth day of the fifth month of Eiroku 3 — conventionally converted to 12 June 1560 — Imagawa Yoshimoto's forces attacked the Oda positions in Owari. Matsudaira Motoyasu's contingent captured Marune, and Washizu also fell.

Yoshimoto had invaded Owari amid fighting over the Imagawa-held Narumi and Ōdaka positions. Recent analysis treats relief of those positions — not a securely documented march to conquer Kyoto — as the campaign's immediate military purpose.

Japanese chronological tables generally apply Julian-calendar dates for the period before the 1582 Gregorian reform.

The attack on the resting headquarters

Oda Nobunaga advanced rapidly from Kiyosu and attacked Yoshimoto's resting headquarters around Okehazama and Dengaku-hazama after a violent downpour.

Hattori Koheita engaged Yoshimoto first and wounded him; Yoshimoto injured Hattori, after which Mōri Shinsuke killed Yoshimoto and took his head.

With Yoshimoto dead, the Imagawa field force was defeated and withdrew from Owari.

What did not happen that afternoon

The once-popular hidden flanking march through a narrow valley is no longer the dominant reconstruction; a more direct attack based on the Shinchō Kōki is widely favoured. The storm appears in the early narrative, but its role as cover for a secret march is an interpretation.

The Imagawa did not disappear. Yoshimoto's son Ujizane succeeded him, and Motoyasu initially remained aligned with the Imagawa.

Motoyasu learned of Yoshimoto's death that evening at Ōdaka, verified the report, withdrew toward Mikawa, and entered his ancestral Okazaki Castle on the twenty-third day, after its Imagawa garrison departed.

12 July 1562, in the plaza at Maní

On 12 July 1562, the Franciscan provincial Diego de Landa and other friars staged a public auto de fe in the plaza of Maní, Yucatán, culminating an investigation into continued Maya religious practices.

Accused Maya were assembled to hear sentences publicly while Maya books, cult images, altar stones, vessels and other ritual objects collected during the investigation were destroyed by fire.

The ceremony proclaimed penalties including flogging, shearing, exile, loss of office and terms of compulsory service. Prominent prisoners were subsequently transferred to Mérida.

The number that is not Landa's

Landa acknowledged finding many books written in Maya characters and burning them because he regarded their contents as superstition and diabolical falsehood. His surviving Relación says only that a "great number" was burned.

The familiar totals — 27 rolls of signs and hieroglyphs on deerskin, 5,000 idols, 13 large altar stones, 22 smaller stones and 197 vessels — derive from a letter written in 1805 and cited by later historians, not from a surviving 1562 inventory.

Landa was neither bishop nor "acting bishop" that year. He was Franciscan minister provincial, exercising contested quasi-episcopal authority before the resident bishop arrived; his episcopal appointment came in 1572.

One month later

Yucatán's first resident bishop, Francisco de Toral, arrived in August. He condemned Landa's methods and halted the extirpation campaign.

The date itself is Julian, as used in sixteenth-century Spanish territories; its proleptic Gregorian equivalent is 22 July.

The man remembered for burning Maya writing also preserved examples of that writing in the book that later aided its decipherment.

January 1565, near the Krishna River

In January 1565 the combined armies of the Deccan sultanates defeated Vijayanagara's army near Rakshasi and Tangadi, south of Talikota and close to the Krishna River — some 20 miles from the town whose name the battle now carries.

After years of Aliya Rama Raya intervening among the rival Deccan states, the principal sultanates had formed a temporary coalition, advanced south, and brought his field army to battle.

The exact day is unsettled. Sources variously place the decisive action or Rama Raya's death on 23, 24, 25 or 26 January, and some describe a longer campaign rather than a single-day battle.

The commander's death, and the rout

Rama Raya, Vijayanagara's de facto ruler and battlefield commander, was captured and beheaded. The loss of its commander precipitated the army's rout.

In one influential reconstruction he was captured beneath his litter, beheaded, and his head raised on a spear where his soldiers could see it — though the chronicles disagree on the details.

His brothers commanded Vijayanagara's wings. Tirumala survived and withdrew toward the capital with remnants of the army; Sadasiva Raya, the nominal emperor, had not commanded at the battle.

What survived

The defeat left the capital exposed, but the extensive sack followed the battle rather than happening on the battlefield that same day.

Archaeology does not support the old image of uniform destruction. The most severe burning clusters around palaces and state-performance spaces; outside the royal centre, evidence for late-sixteenth-century destruction is much thinner.

An Aravidu-ruled Vijayanagara state survived from other capitals for decades after 1565.

The small hours of 7 September 1566

Suleiman I died in his imperial tent at the Ottoman camp near Szigetvár, probably between 1 and 2 a.m. on 7 September 1566.

The elderly and already ill sultan had reportedly been in agony for several days while the month-long siege continued. Scholarship supports death from illness but not a securely diagnosed disease, and the conventional birth date that makes him 71 rests on a birth year that is not entirely secure.

Sources variously date the death to 6 September, the night of 6–7 September, or the first hours of 7 September. The early-hours reconstruction is supported by recent archival and archaeological scholarship.

The death nobody was told about

Grand Vizier Sokollu Mehmed Pasha and the sultan's inner servants concealed the death to preserve military discipline and permit an orderly succession. It was reportedly kept secret for 48 days.

Around noon that same day, fortress commander Miklós Zrínyi led the surviving defenders in their final sortie, unaware that Suleiman had died hours earlier. Zrínyi was killed and Ottoman forces completed the capture.

The imperial tent stood about 4.5 kilometres from the castle.

A succession managed at a distance

Prince Selim was not at Szigetvár. Sokollu sent him the news, after which Selim hurried to Istanbul to receive allegiance.

Contemporary chronicles disagree over whether his arrival and enthronement occurred on 21, 23, 24 or 30 September.

A contemporary-derived account describes a coffin concealed in a specially ordered litter while the campaign continued outwardly in the dead sultan's name.

January 1568, at Torda

The Transylvanian Diet met at Torda from 6 to 13 January 1568 and enacted its religious resolution during that session. Hungarian records identify 13 January as the concluding or promulgation date.

The 28 January date attached to this event is poorly supported: surviving minutes are dated 13 January, a recent scholarly sourcebook labels the text 6 January, and later secondary accounts nevertheless repeat 28 January.

Competing Lutheran, Calvinist and Antitrinitarian interpretations had produced repeated theological disputes, and John Sigismund had accepted Antitrinitarian teaching by the end of 1567.

What the text actually protects

The law allowed pastors to preach the Gospel according to their own interpretation, and allowed a parish to reject that interpretation and retain a preacher whose teaching it accepted.

It barred church superintendents and others from abusing pastors or threatening them with imprisonment or removal from office because of their preaching.

Its legal argument ends not with royal supremacy but with a biblical proposition: faith comes through hearing, and is God's gift.

What it does not say

The resolution names no denominations. It does not list Catholic, Lutheran, Calvinist and Unitarian churches as four equal received religions — full four-confession recognition is associated with later legislation, especially the 1571 Diet.

Nor did it grant every individual an unrestricted right to adopt any belief. Its operative protections centred on preaching and collective congregational choice.

"Europe's first declaration of religious freedom" is likewise too absolute. Scholars disagree about how broadly the text operated in practice, particularly for Catholics and for people outside the privileged political nations.

1 July 1569, at the joint Sejm in Lublin

At the joint Sejm in Lublin, representatives of the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania executed and exchanged two corresponding union documents dated 1 July 1569.

The Polish-side document carries 140 seals; the Lithuanian-side document 77.

Sigismund II Augustus's royal confirmation is dated 4 July, which is why both dates sometimes appear.

One monarch, one Sejm — and two of everything else

The act joined the Crown and the Grand Duchy under one commonly elected monarch and a common Sejm and Senate, replacing the looser personal union with a constitutional "real union."

It established joint foreign policy and currency while Lithuania retained separate ministers, treasury, laws, courts, administration and army.

Historians variously call the result a federation, a confederation, or an intermediate early-modern arrangement; treating any one modern label as definitive is misleading.

The transfers happened before the union

Most Lithuanian delegates, led by Mikołaj Radziwiłł "the Red," had left Lublin on 1 March in opposition to incorporation.

Sigismund answered by transferring Podlasie, Volhynia, Bracław and Kyiv to the Polish Crown during the March–June negotiation crisis. Those acts were imposed by the king; they were not produced by provincial votes on 1 July.

Returned Lithuanian representatives, with Jan Hieronimowicz Chodkiewicz among the negotiators, then accepted a closer union that still preserved the Grand Duchy's state institutions.

August 1569, at Duisburg

In August 1569 Gerardus Mercator published at Duisburg a world wall map titled Nova et aucta orbis terrae descriptio ad usum navigantium emendate accomodata.

It arrived as 18 sheets that assembled into a wall map. The Bibliothèque nationale de France copy measures 200 × 133 cm, at a scale of about 1:20,205,000.

The surviving catalogue record establishes the month but not a publication day.

Why the parallels spread out

The map used straight, parallel meridians and progressively increased the spacing between parallels toward the poles.

That spacing made rhumb lines — courses maintaining a constant compass bearing — appear as straight lines, which is the defining navigational property of the projection.

A straight line on such a chart is a constant-bearing rhumb line, not generally the shortest route between two places. The projection also sends the poles to infinity, so no complete Mercator world map can show them.

Not an overnight change

Mercator did not publish his construction method with the map, leaving later cartographers to reconstruct and mathematically explain it. Modern reconstructions of his exact procedure remain debated.

Edward Wright's Certaine Errors of Navigation, in 1599, supplied the mathematical tables and explanation that helped make Mercator charts reproducible.

Adoption was gradual. Seventeenth-century mariners continued using plane charts, and the 1569 publication did not solve the separate problems of finding longitude or correcting for magnetic declination.

Contact at the mouth of the Gulf of Patras

On 7 October 1571 the Holy League fleet under Don John of Austria met the Ottoman fleet under Müezzinzade Ali Pasha at the entrance to the Gulf of Patras — not inside the port of Lepanto itself, despite the name the battle carries.

The two fleets sighted one another during the morning and fighting began around 11:30. Six Venetian galleasses opened with heavy artillery before the lines closed.

Boarding fights across galley decks

Once the fleets closed, the engagement became an extended series of collisions, boardings, and infantry fights across galley decks. Álvaro de Bazán led the allied reserve into threatened sections of the line; Agostino Barbarigo, commanding the Venetian-heavy wing, was mortally wounded.

Around 14:00 Don John's flagship Real gained control of Ali Pasha's flagship. Ali Pasha was killed and his severed head was displayed on a pike.

What the commanders counted afterwards

Fighting continued for roughly two more hours before Uluç Ali withdrew with the surviving vessels of his wing, leaving the Holy League in possession of the battlefield and much of the Ottoman fleet. The Spanish Army Museum puts the whole action at approximately five hours.

Holy League commanders reported afterwards that they had freed 15,000 Christian captives and taken 117 galleys and 13 galliots. Their casualty estimate was 7,500 allied dead and 20,000 wounded against 8,000 Ottoman dead and 25,000 wounded; fleet, casualty, and prisoner totals differ substantially among contemporary reports and modern historians.

The victory did not recover Cyprus, which Venice formally ceded to the Ottomans in the subsequent peace.

1571–1572: a technique retuned for Andean ore

During 1571 and 1572 the Spanish miner Pedro Fernández de Velasco adapted a relatively inexpensive mercury-amalgamation technique, known as beneficio de cajones, to Andean ores and conditions.

Viceroy Francisco de Toledo summoned him to demonstrate the process at Cusco, then employed him to teach it to refiners at Potosí. The method recovered silver from low-grade ore that could no longer be treated efficiently by the existing fuel-intensive smelting.

Mercury from one mountain, silver from another

By 1572 mercury shipments from Huancavelica were reaching Cerro Rico, supplying the material the new refining required. Records show 348 quintals arriving at Potosí in 1572 and 569 quintals in 1573.

Construction of Potosí's new ore-crushing and amalgamation mills began in 1572. By 1576 the district had 108 refining ingenios.

Not one year, and not the chemistry alone

The date usually given as 1571 is too precise. Scholarly accounts variously distinguish Fernández de Velasco's 1571–1572 adaptation, introduction in 1572, broader implementation through 1572–1576, and effective adoption around 1574, partly because they use introduction, adaptation, and mine-wide adoption to mean different stages.

There was no single-day production explosion. The marked surge is visible after about 1575, and it depended on mercury supply, hydraulic infrastructure, capital, and the mita labour draft as much as on the chemical technique.

Potosí's silver output grew almost sixfold between 1575 and 1590.