Bamboo Annals
Traditional founding of the Shang dynasty by King Tang
View full image ↗ How was this image made?
The creative brief sent to the image model. These are instructions, not a record of what actually happened.
Original prompt & settings (JSON) ↗1558 BCE is not written on any ancient object. It is the left-hand, uncorrected column in a modern chronology table.
Where the number comes from
The date 1558 BCE is a calculated absolute year attached to a transmitted chronology, not an inscriptional or archaeological date. David Nivison's table gives 1558 as the Annals-derived first year of Tang but proposes 1554 BCE once the chronology is corrected.
The same table gives the conquest as 1559 in the received text against 1555 corrected.
Other modern chronologies place early Shang only approximately, around 1600 BCE.
A thunderstorm, a capture, an exile
In the received Bamboo Annals, the final year of the Xia ruler Jie has Tang's Shang forces attack the Xia capital, defeat Kunwu and fight the Xia army at Mingtiao during a great thunderstorm.
The Xia army was defeated; Jie fled, was captured at Jiaomen and was exiled to Nanchao.
The following Shang notice says assembled lords honoured Tianyi Lü — King Tang — as Son of Heaven, and that after three ritual refusals he took the position.
What the source is, and is not
"According to the Bamboo Annals" does not make this an archaeologically verified event. The original text was reportedly recovered from a tomb around 281 CE and then lost; the received current text is a late reconstruction whose relationship to the original is disputed.
Oracle-bone writing begins centuries after Tang, so it cannot independently confirm the Mingtiao battle, Jie's exile or the year.
Battle, exile and enthronement form a transmitted sequence; they cannot confidently be assigned to a single literal day.
Sources
Researched 24 Aug 2026 6 sources not yet audited Traditional date
How this was checked
Researched from the web into a fact sheet and rewritten from that sheet. This article has not yet had an independent model audit. How the pipeline works →
Traditional date. This date is the conventional one, not one fixed by a contemporary record.
What the sources leave uncertain
- No contemporary record from 1558 BCE survives. The date is a later chronological calculation, not an inscriptional or archaeological date.
- The original Bamboo Annals was reportedly recovered from a tomb around 281 CE but was later lost. The received current text is a late reconstruction whose relationship to the original remains debated.
- Nivison retained substantial confidence in the Annals tradition but corrected the first Shang year from 1558 to 1554 BCE. Other modern chronologies generally place early Shang only approximately around 1600 BCE.
- Oracle-bone writing begins centuries after Tang and therefore cannot independently verify the Mingtiao story, Jie’s exile or the year 1558 BCE.
Checked against
- Received Bamboo Annals, upper scroll
- The Key to the Chronology of the Three Dynasties: The Modern Text Bamboo Annals
- David S. Nivison, the Bamboo Annals, and the Chronology of Xia
- Shang dynasty, ca. 1600–1050 BCE — Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art
- Oracle Bone Script — Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art
- Anyang archaeological site — Academia Sinica