Second Persian invasion of Greece
Xerxes departs Sardis for the invasion of Greece
View full image ↗ How was this image made?
The creative brief sent to the image model. These are instructions, not a record of what actually happened.
Original prompt & settings (JSON) ↗Persian engineers had cut a canal through the Mount Athos peninsula because an earlier fleet was wrecked trying to round it. The invasion took four years to prepare.
Spring 480 BCE: the army leaves Sardis
At the beginning of spring in 480 BCE, with the canal at Athos, the Hellespont bridges and the rest of the preparations complete, Xerxes and his army departed Sardis for Abydos.
By the Herodotean chronology those preparations had taken four full years, from spring 484. Roads, depots, bridges and the canal all came before the march.
Two bridges, split by traffic
At the Hellespont — the modern Dardanelles, not the Bosporus — the force prepared a ceremonial crossing on two pontoon bridges joining Asia to Europe.
Herodotus says the road was strewn with myrtle and incense was burned, and that at sunrise Xerxes poured a libation from a golden vessel and cast offerings into the water. Troops and horses used the bridge nearer the Black Sea; baggage animals and the service train used the one nearer the Aegean.
What the crossing changed
Once across, the land army could advance through Persian-controlled Thrace and Macedonia, supported by a fleet moving along the coast and by supplies staged in advance. Greece now faced a coordinated land-and-sea invasion rather than the maritime expedition that had ended at Marathon.
The force was drawn from across the empire rather than one people: Herodotus's traditional catalogue names 46 peoples, his own categories and not modern nations. His million-scale totals are rejected by modern scholars, whose estimates vary widely among themselves.
Even the omen does not survive checking. Herodotus places an ominous daytime darkness at the departure, but no solar eclipse fits Sardis in spring 480, and commentary suggests separate eclipse traditions were conflated.
Sources
Researched 23 Aug 2026 6 sources 2 audit passes
How this was checked
Researched from the web into a fact sheet, rewritten from that sheet, then audited against it by a different model. How the pipeline works →
What the sources leave uncertain
- Spring 480 BCE is well supported, but no securely convertible day is preserved for the departure from Sardis or the Hellespont crossing.
- “Sets out” is ambiguous: Xerxes had traveled from the imperial interior to Sardis earlier, while the campaign proper is conventionally dated from the spring departure from Sardis and subsequent crossing into Europe.
- Herodotus’ account of a solar eclipse at the departure cannot match Sardis in spring 480; scholarly commentary suggests that separate eclipse traditions were conflated.
- The scale of Xerxes’ force is heavily disputed. Herodotus’ million-scale totals are rejected by modern scholars, whose estimates also vary widely.