Civil Rights Cases
The Supreme Court voids the 1875 public-accommodations protections in the Civil Rights Cases
View full image ↗ How was this image made?
The creative brief sent to the image model. These are instructions, not a record of what actually happened.
Original prompt & settings (JSON) ↗Four of the five cases reached the Supreme Court without appearances or briefs from the defendants.
15 October 1883, five cases at once
The Supreme Court decided the five consolidated Civil Rights Cases on 15 October 1883 — not 16 October, the date this entry lists — reported at 109 U.S. 3. By 8–1 it held sections 1 and 2 of the Civil Rights Act of 1875 unconstitutional as applied within the states.
Four were federal criminal proceedings over alleged denials at hotels and theatres. One theatre indictment did not even state the excluded person's colour. The fifth, Robinson and wife v. Memphis & Charleston Railroad, was a private civil action after Sallie Robinson was excluded from a railroad's ladies' car because she was of African descent.
Bradley's line between state and private action
Justice Joseph P. Bradley's majority opinion held that the Fourteenth Amendment authorized corrective federal legislation against state action, not direct regulation of purely private refusals by innkeepers, theatres and public conveyances.
The majority accepted that Congress could legislate against slavery's badges and incidents under the Thirteenth Amendment, but held that denial of equal public accommodations was not such a badge or incident. The $500 statutory penalty went with the sections.
Harlan alone
Justice John Marshall Harlan dissented, arguing that licensed inns, public conveyances and places of amusement exercised public or quasi-public functions, and that the majority read the Reconstruction Amendments too narrowly. He contrasted the national power once used to protect slaveholders with the majority's refusal to use national power for freed citizens.
The Court affirmed the judgments in Ryan and Robinson and directed that the remaining indictments be disposed of on the ground that sections 1 and 2 were void. It expressly left questions involving the territories and Congress's interstate-commerce power undecided.
Sources
Researched 23 Aug 2026 8 sources 2 audit passes Date corrected
How this was checked
Researched from the web into a fact sheet, rewritten from that sheet, then audited against it by a different model. How the pipeline works →
Date corrected. The research places this at 1883-10-15.
What the sources leave uncertain
- The decision date is not genuinely disputed: the official United States Reports and GovInfo give October 15, 1883. The slug and listed date are one day late.
- Some online transcriptions contain erroneous decision metadata; the official reporter should control.
- The decision’s later doctrinal fate is mixed: its Fourteenth Amendment state-action requirement remains influential, while later cases adopted broader Thirteenth Amendment enforcement power.
Checked against
- GovInfo: Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883)
- Library of Congress: U.S. Reports, Civil Rights Cases
- Justia: Civil Rights Cases, full opinion and dissent
- U.S. Senate Historical Office: Civil Rights Act of 1875
- Congress.gov Constitution Annotated: State Action Doctrine
- Congress.gov Constitution Annotated: Scope of the Thirteenth Amendment Enforcement Clause
- Oyez: Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States
- Frederick Douglass, Civil Rights Mass Meeting Speech, October 22, 1883