Council of Jerusalem
Jerusalem meeting decides the terms of the Gentile mission
View full image ↗ How was this image made?
The creative brief sent to the image model. These are instructions, not a record of what actually happened.
Original prompt & settings (JSON) ↗Acts gives the decision a startling formula — "the holy Spirit and we" — attaching divine authorization to a negotiated communal letter.
A demand carried up from Judea
No exact date survives for the meeting; James Dunn reports proposals from 43 to 51 CE, with 48 or 49 preferred by the majority he surveyed.
According to Acts, visitors from Judea told Gentile believers at Antioch that circumcision according to Mosaic practice was necessary for salvation. The claim provoked a dispute with Paul and Barnabas, and the Antioch community sent them, with others, to Jerusalem — where the apostles and elders took up the question.
Peter, then the missionaries, then James
Acts portrays Peter as opposing the imposition of the Mosaic law on Gentiles, and Paul and Barnabas as reporting on their Gentile mission.
James spoke last, proposing that Gentile converts not be burdened with the law.
A letter, and two men sent to confirm it
The assembly wrote to Gentile believers in Antioch, Syria and Cilicia. The letter rejected compulsory circumcision while prescribing abstention from idol-related pollution, blood, strangled meat, and sexual unions or immorality — four restrictions in the standard Acts 15 form of the decree.
It did not simply go by courier. Acts says Judas Barsabbas and Silas carried the letter to Antioch, where its encouraging message was received with rejoicing.
Sources
Researched 23 Aug 2026 5 sources not yet audited Date disputed
How this was checked
Researched from the web into a fact sheet and rewritten from that sheet. This article has not yet had an independent model audit. How the pipeline works →
Date disputed. Sources disagree; the research places it at ~0049.
What the sources leave uncertain
- No exact date survives. Dunn reports proposals from 43 to 51 CE, with 48 or 49 preferred by the majority he surveyed; other reference works use about 50.
- Scholars dispute whether Galatians 2:1–10 describes the same meeting as Acts 15.
- The USCCB notes that Acts may telescope a circumcision agreement and a separate dietary decree into one narrative.
- The wording and interpretation of the decree vary among textual traditions, especially the term traditionally translated as sexual immorality or fornication.